INNA
INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
02/13/2025
Did you know this trademark is already registered in United States?
Before investing in name, identity, and promotion, validate collision risk and registration strategy to avoid wasting time and budget.
Executive reading for naming, filing, and monitoring decisions.
USPTO status
Case type
Recorded events
Latest update
Trademark type
Nice classes
Filing date
Registration date
Expiration date
Structured fields from the responsible authority and the official record.
Status date
Last transaction
Responsible office
Status code
Official register
Drawing code
Owner type
Owner location
Examiner
Law office
Holders
Representatives
Leo M. Loughlin Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc
Nice Classes
Vienna Codes
No Vienna codes available.
Goods and services
Class 24
Class 35
Class 44
History of USPTO decisions and trademark events.
53 publications found
INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
02/13/2025
NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
11/28/2022
TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
10/26/2021
CANCELLED SECTION 71
02/26/2021
COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
08/18/2018
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
09/14/2017
PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
04/14/2017
PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
05/22/2016
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
09/22/2015
REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
09/22/2015
CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
09/22/2015
TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
08/14/2015
FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
05/05/2013
FINAL DECISION PROCESSED AND SENT TO IB
08/30/2010
FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
11/19/2009
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER
08/18/2009
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION
06/02/2009
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
05/13/2009
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
04/30/2009
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
04/30/2009
ASSIGNED TO LIE
04/28/2009
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
04/28/2009
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
04/24/2009
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
04/24/2009
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
04/24/2009
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
03/20/2009
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED
03/11/2009
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
03/10/2009
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
03/05/2009
NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
03/05/2009
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
02/09/2009
NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED
01/10/2009
DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
01/06/2009
CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
01/06/2009
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
12/17/2008
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
12/17/2008
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
12/11/2008
DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
12/09/2008
PAPER RECEIVED
12/09/2008
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
06/09/2008
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
06/09/2008
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
05/13/2008
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
05/13/2008
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
05/13/2008
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
05/13/2008
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
12/07/2007
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
11/13/2007
REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
11/13/2007
NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
11/10/2007
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
11/09/2007
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
11/07/2007
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED
09/28/2007
SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB
09/27/2007
Continuous trademark protection
Professional 24-month watch service: we monitor USPTO for you and alert you in time to oppose — before conflicts become losses.